arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Taming the Qizilbash and Quelling Their Echoes: Ottoman Appropriations of ʿAli

Hüseyin Ongan Arslan

Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient2025https://doi.org/10.1163/15685209-12341644article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract This article delves into the Ottoman Empire’s nuanced response to the Qizilbash challenge, a significant outcome of the evolving religious and political landscapes in sixteenth-century West Asia. The Ottomans grappled with various strategies, seemingly contradictory, to counter the persistent Qizilbash influence. Among these reactions, a focal point is the Ottomans’ endeavor to claim ʿAli within the Devlet-i ʿAliyye-i ʿOsmaniye (The Sublime State of the Ottomans). Narratives by Kemalpaşazade (d. 1534), the esteemed chief-jurisconsult, and Celalzade Mustafa (d. 1567), a distinguished chancellor, shed light on this approach. Celalzade notably employed anti-Qizilbash tales, emphasizing the contradiction in revering ʿAli while harboring enmity towards the first three caliphs. This narrative strategy aimed to challenge the Safavid Qizilbash state’s foundational arguments, promote “Ottoman Sunni” Islam as a cohesive belief system for ʿAli’s partisans, and ease Qizilbash animosity towards the initial three “rightly-guided” caliphs, pivotal to the Ottoman creed and Ottoman imperial identity.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15685209-12341644

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hüseyin2025,
  title        = {{Taming the Qizilbash and Quelling Their Echoes: Ottoman Appropriations of ʿAli}},
  author       = {Hüseyin Ongan Arslan},
  journal      = {Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15685209-12341644},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Taming the Qizilbash and Quelling Their Echoes: Ottoman Appropriations of ʿAli

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.