arbiter
JournalsAccount

Unpacking Corporate Slack: How Excess Resources Shape Earnings Management

Liaw YC et al.

Business Research Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444261416938article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study investigates the dual role of organizational slack in shaping managerial behavior by examining its impact on earnings management. Using a large sample of 89,782 firm-year observations of US-listed firms from 1991 to 2022, we find that firms with greater slack are generally less likely to engage in earnings manipulation. We interpret these findings through the lens of the resource-based view (RBV), which provides a perspective on how slack, as a strategic resource, can influence managerial choices. Specifically, by alleviating short-term performance pressures, slack enables managers to prioritize long-term value creation over opportunistic reporting. Decomposing slack into its components reveals nuanced patterns: its effect on real earnings management is robust across firms, whereas its impact on discretionary accruals is significant primarily in firms with strong managerial incentives. Taken together, these findings enhance our understanding of how resource flexibility shapes firms’ financial reporting. Jel Classification: G32; G34; M41

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444261416938

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{liaw2026,
  title        = {{Unpacking Corporate Slack: How Excess Resources Shape Earnings Management}},
  author       = {Liaw YC et al.},
  journal      = {Business Research Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444261416938},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Unpacking Corporate Slack: How Excess Resources Shape Earnings Management

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.