A Multilevel Integrated Review on Age Diversity in the Workplace: A Focus on Age Differences in Dyads, Groups, and Organizations

Yon Jin Suh & Ki-Jung Kim

Work, Aging and Retirement2025https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaf021article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Abstract In recent years, the implications of an age-diverse workforce have attracted significant scholarly interest and public debate, especially in light of an increasingly aging population. Accordingly, we systematically review existing research on age diversity within workplaces and organize and critically appraise the literature focusing on three themes: 1) conceptualizations, operationalizations, and relevant constructs, 2) underlying theoretical mechanisms and outcomes, and 3) contextual moderators/boundary conditions. Based on these themes, we synthesize findings into an integrative framework to provide a holistic view of the literature. Emphasizing the importance of taking a multilevel, multidimensional, and process-oriented approach when conducting research on age diversity in workplaces, we raise specific issues and opportunities for future research across each theme while discussing their theoretical and practical implications. We hope that our comprehensive, systematic, interdisciplinary review will open new avenues of research on this important topic.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaf021

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yon2025,
  title        = {{A Multilevel Integrated Review on Age Diversity in the Workplace: A Focus on Age Differences in Dyads, Groups, and Organizations}},
  author       = {Yon Jin Suh & Ki-Jung Kim},
  journal      = {Work, Aging and Retirement},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaf021},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Multilevel Integrated Review on Age Diversity in the Workplace: A Focus on Age Differences in Dyads, Groups, and Organizations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.