arbiter
JournalsAccount

Dissipation of inheritance windfalls and the case for time-phased transfers: An empirical assessment from HRS data

Cory Thompson & Russell James III

Financial Services Review2026https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v34i1.4307article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study investigates whether inheritances are managed differently than other financial windfalls, testing predictions from Terror Management Theory. Using Health and Retirement Study data (2010–2018), we analyze 3,005 inheritance receipts compared to 1,285 other windfalls (e.g., gifts, lawsuits, insurance settlements). Overall, inheritors were similarly likely (42% vs. 44%) to have spent their entire windfalls when measured about one year later (next survey wave). However, when adjusting for inheritances being nearly three times larger, regressions revealed that inheritors were 24% more likely to immediately spend the entire windfall (OR = 1.24, p < .05). Overall, each inherited dollar increased next-wave net worth by only $0.61. These findings suggest rapid dissipation of bequests is common, perhaps due to an avoidance response to the death-related source of funds. Consequently, advisers and estate planners might better meet client objectives through phased or recurring income distributions instead of lump-sum transfers.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v34i1.4307

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{cory2026,
  title        = {{Dissipation of inheritance windfalls and the case for time-phased transfers: An empirical assessment from HRS data}},
  author       = {Cory Thompson & Russell James III},
  journal      = {Financial Services Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v34i1.4307},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Dissipation of inheritance windfalls and the case for time-phased transfers: An empirical assessment from HRS data

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.