Service Level Requirements for Real Life–Sized Bicycle Sharing Systems

Lucas M. Parada et al.

Transportation Science2026https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.1010article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper presents a two-step approach to managing service level requirements (SLRs) in real-life bicycle sharing systems (BSSs). SLR is a general concept that broadly describes how to effectively manage a BSS to improve user satisfaction while minimizing system operation costs. The two steps consist of two proposed problems: First, the target-level problem computes target bicycle quantities for stations, maximizing trip satisfaction. Second, the bicycle rebalancing problem designs vehicle routes to adjust bicycle quantities. The SLR literature includes several variants of these problems, but to our knowledge, very few exact approaches such as the one we propose can successfully handle real-life BSS, which comprise thousands of stations, tens of thousands of bicycles, and nearly 100,000 daily trips. We gather data from real-life BSSs from Boston, Chicago, Madrid, Mexico City, Montreal, New York, San Francisco, Toronto, and Washington, DC. From a managerial perspective, our numerical results provide the decision makers of BSSs with several insights related to bicycle and station usage throughout the network of stations. Funding: This work was supported by the Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) under [Grant 2021-04037].

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.1010

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lucas2026,
  title        = {{Service Level Requirements for Real Life–Sized Bicycle Sharing Systems}},
  author       = {Lucas M. Parada et al.},
  journal      = {Transportation Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.1010},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Service Level Requirements for Real Life–Sized Bicycle Sharing Systems

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.