Accounting Enforcement and Bank Transparency under Hierarchical Supervision in a Banking Union

Jannis Bischof et al.

The Accounting Review2026https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2023-0162article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Banks often adjust their financial reporting in response to supervisory intervention. However, many banks operate under multiple supervisors with varying preferences. We examine how banks respond to such conflicting oversight within the European Banking Union, where the European Central Bank (ECB) is the central authority. The ECB’s Asset Quality Review revealed that its preferred asset valuations diverged from many banks’ IFRS-compliant practices that were previously accepted by local supervisors. Banks voluntarily aligned their reporting with the nonbinding preferences of the new central supervisor, although the adjustments varied across jurisdictions. Alignment was weaker when central and local supervisory objectives conflicted and stronger when joint supervision mitigated regulatory capture. Overall, these adjustments enhanced the informativeness of loan loss provisioning. With aligned reporting preferences across supervisory layers, the introduction of a central supervisor can thus significantly improve bank reporting and transparency, even without formal enforcement. Data Availability: The data used in this study are available from the sources identified in the manuscript. JEL Classifications: M41; M48; G20; G21; G28.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2023-0162

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jannis2026,
  title        = {{Accounting Enforcement and Bank Transparency under Hierarchical Supervision in a Banking Union}},
  author       = {Jannis Bischof et al.},
  journal      = {The Accounting Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2023-0162},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Accounting Enforcement and Bank Transparency under Hierarchical Supervision in a Banking Union

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.