arbiter
JournalsAccount

Field Presence and the Performance of Environmental Projects: Evidence from the Global Environment Facility

Giuseppe Zaccaria & Bernhard Reinsberg

International Studies Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag002article
AJG 4ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Scant attention has been paid to how field presence shapes the implementation of environment-earmarked projects by international organizations (IOs), such as those funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF). GEF funding is based on a process whereby implementing IOs and recipient partners co-design projects based on GEF criteria. Once approved by GEF, projects are implemented with no direct GEF involvement, but are later evaluated by a dedicated GEF unit. We assume that IO country officials are key players in project implementation processes, and we expect that their field presence shapes implementation performance. Drawing on data from approximately 1,000 GEF projects delivered by five implementing IOs from 1997 to 2020, our analysis suggests that implementation performance is evaluated better where IO country officials have greater field presence. This has implications for debates on multilateral funding, IO bureaucracies, localization, and IO performance.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag002

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{giuseppe2026,
  title        = {{Field Presence and the Performance of Environmental Projects: Evidence from the Global Environment Facility}},
  author       = {Giuseppe Zaccaria & Bernhard Reinsberg},
  journal      = {International Studies Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag002},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Field Presence and the Performance of Environmental Projects: Evidence from the Global Environment Facility

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.