Option better than action? Autonomy over remote work, technostress, and mental health disparities in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic

Andreas Sarling et al.

Acta Psychologica2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.106185article
ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic transformed work environments globally, with remote work becoming a more prevalent occupational feature. This study examines the association of different remote work options and extents, as well as technostress, on mental health outcomes (anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep problems, and stress) during the pandemic in Sweden, taking sex differences into account. Using data from 3660 participants in 2020 and 2022 from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health (SLOSH) and guided by an extended job demands-resources (JD-R) model, the study used Bayesian multivariate multilevel modelling to analyze predictors of mental health. Key findings reveal that the option for remote work, even when unused, related to better mental health outcomes. Extent of remote work showed no consistent associations. Technostress predicted mental health problems, with an even stronger association for remote workers-compared to on-site workers-in terms of anxiety. Women reported worse mental health outcomes compared to men; however, these disparities appeared to be driven by other factors than by remote work conditions or childcare. Sweden's unique pandemic policies, including open schools, could have mitigated some stressors associated with caregiving responsibilities. These findings highlight the need for flexible work policies, strategies to manage digital demands, and further investigation into explanatory factors behind sex differences in mental health.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.106185

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{andreas2026,
  title        = {{Option better than action? Autonomy over remote work, technostress, and mental health disparities in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic}},
  author       = {Andreas Sarling et al.},
  journal      = {Acta Psychologica},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.106185},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Option better than action? Autonomy over remote work, technostress, and mental health disparities in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.