Humanizing the Transgressor, Dehumanizing the Victim: The Asymmetric Effects of Transgressors’ Good Intentions in Immoral Behaviour

Sofía Moreno‐Gata et al.

European Journal of Social Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70040article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Dehumanization is a potential consequence of moral judgments that may influence how people perceive and relate to those involved in a moral transgression. We propose that a transgressor's intentions shape perceptions of both transgressors’ and victims’ humanness. In Study 1 ( n = 315), we examined the dehumanization of the transgressor while manipulating their intentions (good vs. bad) and the consequences of their actions. In Study 2 ( n = 341), we focused on the dehumanization of the victim, and we manipulated the transgressor's intentions and transgressor–bystander closeness. Intentions significantly influenced humanness attributions in both cases. Transgressors with good intentions were less dehumanized than those with bad intentions, regardless of consequences. Moreover, having good intentions increased the dehumanization of the victim, independently of closeness. These effects were serially mediated by the greater likability and the attribution of a positive moral character to the transgressor. Our findings have implications for understanding social conflict, justice, and interpersonal evaluations.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70040

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sofía2026,
  title        = {{Humanizing the Transgressor, Dehumanizing the Victim: The Asymmetric Effects of Transgressors’ Good Intentions in Immoral Behaviour}},
  author       = {Sofía Moreno‐Gata et al.},
  journal      = {European Journal of Social Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70040},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Humanizing the Transgressor, Dehumanizing the Victim: The Asymmetric Effects of Transgressors’ Good Intentions in Immoral Behaviour

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.