Perceived institutional mindset is associated with college students’ psychological experiences and academic outcomes

Wen Bu et al.

Journal of Social Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2025.2608310article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Do students perceive mindset beliefs communicated by their colleges, and if so, how are they reflected in students' psychological and academic outcomes? This research explores how students' important outcomes are linked to perceived institutional mindset: students' perceptions of the degree to which their college views ability as immutable and unchangeable (an institutional fixed mindset) or malleable and expandable (an institutional growth mindset). With a diverse sample of first-year students (<i>N</i> > 10,000) at 22 U.S. colleges, we hypothesized, and found, that perceiving more of an institutional growth (vs. fixed) mindset is associated with greater belonging and academic self-confidence, better health and well-being, higher grades, and more credits taken and earned. Moreover, perceived institutional growth mindset correlates with lower stereotype threat, especially among underrepresented minority and first-generation college students. Given these relationships with important student outcomes, institutional mindset may be an important contextual factor for understanding students' experiences.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2025.2608310

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{wen2026,
  title        = {{Perceived institutional mindset is associated with college students’ psychological experiences and academic outcomes}},
  author       = {Wen Bu et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Social Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2025.2608310},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Perceived institutional mindset is associated with college students’ psychological experiences and academic outcomes

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.