Cities and Agricultural Development

Linda Steinhuebel-Rasheed et al.

Annual Review of Resource Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-101623-104546article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.44

Abstract

In recent decades, rapid urbanization in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has significantly affected agrifood systems and agricultural development. Innovations in transportation, storage, and value chains, as well as the expansion of nonfarm sectors, have transformed rural communities and reshaped agricultural production patterns. This review revisits the evolving link between cities and agriculture in LMICs, drawing on key theoretical frameworks and recent empirical findings. Three major pathways determining the interaction between urban centers and agricultural development emerge. First, transportation costs and access to urban markets continue to influence agricultural decision-making. Second, changing consumer preferences following urbanization and growing integration into global agrifood value chains drive lasting changes in local farming systems. Third, the expansion of urban nonfarm labor markets is shifting labor away from farms, with uncertain consequences for agricultural development. As a result, the empirical evidence is often context specific.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-101623-104546

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{linda2025,
  title        = {{Cities and Agricultural Development}},
  author       = {Linda Steinhuebel-Rasheed et al.},
  journal      = {Annual Review of Resource Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-101623-104546},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Cities and Agricultural Development

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.