arbiter
JournalsAccount

Scrutinising Frontex: The European Parliament and Accountability through Discharge

Magnus G. Schoeller & Peter Slominski

Journal of Common Market Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70097article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article examines how the European Parliament (EP) has leveraged the budgetary discharge procedure to enhance the political accountability of the EU's Border and Coast Guard Agency, Frontex. Whilst the procedure is formally limited to budget implementation, the EP has used it as an accountability tool that goes far beyond financial oversight, addressing broader issues such as fundamental rights and operational effectiveness. Employing a rationalist bargaining perspective on institutional change, the article highlights the EP's use of strategies to compensate for its lack of formal oversight powers. Based on systematic document analysis and original interview material, the findings reveal how the EP has significantly expanded the scope of the discharge procedure over time, thus increasing its de facto scrutiny powers. The analysis of this informal ‘self‐empowerment’ shows how the EP can enhance the political accountability of increasingly powerful EU agencies even if it lacks formal competences.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70097

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{magnus2026,
  title        = {{Scrutinising Frontex: The European Parliament and Accountability through Discharge}},
  author       = {Magnus G. Schoeller & Peter Slominski},
  journal      = {Journal of Common Market Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70097},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Scrutinising Frontex: The European Parliament and Accountability through Discharge

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.