Trust, Prosociality and Immigration Policy Views: Evidence From Swedish Twin Data During 2009–2010

Qinya Feng

Political Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217251410743article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The consequences of migration-induced diversity for social cohesion have received significant attention, yet recent research highlights the positive influence of social trust in shaping native-born people’s views on immigration. It remains unclear, however, whether the relationship is partially driven by prosociality, which is closely associated with but distinct from trust, or other confounders. This study uses Swedish twin data to examine these relationships, employing twin fixed effects to control for confounding factors shared within families. The findings show that generalised social trust and several forms of prosocial behaviour are associated with more favourable views on immigration policy, but only the effects of trust remain robust within the identical twin subsample. The influence of trust appears independent of prosociality and primarily relates to immigrant acceptance. Overall, the findings suggest that generalised trust reflects an inclusive outlook. The results are also discussed in light of recent changes in Sweden’s sociopolitical landscape.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217251410743

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{qinya2026,
  title        = {{Trust, Prosociality and Immigration Policy Views: Evidence From Swedish Twin Data During 2009–2010}},
  author       = {Qinya Feng},
  journal      = {Political Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217251410743},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Trust, Prosociality and Immigration Policy Views: Evidence From Swedish Twin Data During 2009–2010

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.