arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Owner Risk Crisis Communication: Revisiting the Korean Air ‘Nut Rage’ Apology

Yunna Rhee et al.

Management Communication Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189251415166article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This case study examines the Korean Air “Nut Rage” incident as a high-profile example of “owner risk” within South Korea’s chaebol system, where inherited family control can lead to public crises. It analyzes Korean Air’s crisis communication strategy, focusing on CEO Cho’s emotion-centered apology on behalf of his daughter, and situates this within Korean cultural expectations around familial responsibility. The case explores how protecting the company’s owner over stakeholders intensified public backlash, especially in an era of social media where traditional media control is ineffective. It also assesses the financial consequences through an event study and investigates the effectiveness of different apology types in restoring public trust. This case is appropriate for graduate or advanced undergraduate courses in Crisis Communication, Business Ethics, Corporate Governance, and Asian Business, offering students insights into crisis leadership, corporate accountability, and stakeholder management in family-led firms.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189251415166

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yunna2026,
  title        = {{Owner Risk Crisis Communication: Revisiting the Korean Air ‘Nut Rage’ Apology}},
  author       = {Yunna Rhee et al.},
  journal      = {Management Communication Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189251415166},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Owner Risk Crisis Communication: Revisiting the Korean Air ‘Nut Rage’ Apology

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.