arbiter
JournalsAccount

Robots, Operational Flexibility, and Firm‐Level Inefficiency Gap

Jianhong Qi et al.

Journal of Economics & Management Strategy2026https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.70031article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of robot adoption on firm‐level inefficiency gaps, defined as the wedge between the value of the marginal product of labor and the market wage. We develop a theoretical framework where firms endogenously assign robots and labors to different production tasks based on comparative advantage. Because robots incur lower adjustment costs than human labor, a higher robot‐to‐labor ratio enhances operational flexibility. This flexibility allows firms to respond to exogenous demand shocks through more frequent, incremental adjustments, thereby maintaining labor inputs at their optimal levels and narrowing the inefficiency gap. Testing this model with a comprehensive survey of Chinese manufacturing firms (2000–2013), we find a increase in the robot‐to‐labor ratio results in a reduction in the inefficiency gap. Mechanism analysis confirms that automated firms are significantly more likely to execute continuous, small‐scale operational adjustments, validating the role of enhanced operational flexibility in reducing resource misallocation.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.70031

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jianhong2026,
  title        = {{Robots, Operational Flexibility, and Firm‐Level Inefficiency Gap}},
  author       = {Jianhong Qi et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Economics & Management Strategy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.70031},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Robots, Operational Flexibility, and Firm‐Level Inefficiency Gap

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.