When You Say It: How the Timing of LGBTQ+ Allyship Displays Shapes Evaluations of Organizations

Michael W. White & James T. Carter

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2025.104464article
FT50AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

• Timing affects LGBTQ+ observers’ evaluations and attributions of LGBTQ+ allyship displays. • Unlike LGBTQ+ people, Cis-straight people evaluate the authenticity of allyship displays the same regardless of timing. • Attributions of values-driven motives mediate the relationship between allyship timing and perceived authenticity. • Among LGBTQ+ people, the timing of LGBTQ+ allyship displays shapes their belonging and commitment to their organization. Organizations frequently aim to display their allyship with the LGBTQ+ community, often through campaigns, advertisements, and statements, particularly during Pride Month. Although existing research typically focuses on the content of such allyship displays, we integrate theories of attribution and identity safety to reveal how the perceived authenticity of organizational allyship depends on when organizations display it. Across six preregistered experiments using field, laboratory, and online samples, we find that both LGBTQ+ observers (Experiments 1, 3, 5, and 6) and LGBTQ+ employees (Experiments 2 and 4) perceive organizational allyship displays as less authentic when displayed during Pride Month as opposed to other times, even when the content of the allyship display is held constant. We further find that the timing of organizational allyship displays shapes perceived authenticity because timing shapes the extent to which LGBTQ+ individuals attribute values-driven motives to the organization’s allyship (Experiments 3 and 4), a process that, in turn, impacts employees’ sense of belonging and organizational commitment (Experiment 4). Lastly, we find that this effect is unique to LGBTQ+ individuals: non-target groups, such as cis-straight observers, evaluate the authenticity of allyship displays similarly, regardless of timing (Experiments 5 and 6). This work advances research on allyship and has implications for how perceptions of allyship are influenced by social identity. To be an authentic ally, it is not just what an organization says, but also when an organization says it.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2025.104464

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{michael2026,
  title        = {{When You Say It: How the Timing of LGBTQ+ Allyship Displays Shapes Evaluations of Organizations}},
  author       = {Michael W. White & James T. Carter},
  journal      = {Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2025.104464},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

When You Say It: How the Timing of LGBTQ+ Allyship Displays Shapes Evaluations of Organizations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.