arbiter
JournalsAccount

First as tragedy, then as tease: marketable cynicism and the return of fascism

Stefan Schwarzkopf

Consumption, Markets and Culture2026https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2026.2630779article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This commentary calls on our scholarly community to rethink what Fascism might be in the twenty-first century, and what its origins in social media consumption might have to tell us about the connection between neoliberal market cultures and political instability. I argue that Fascism is still a relevant concept for analysing our present moment, as long as it is not framed by early twentieth-century definitions. Rather than use Fascism as a convenient label, it should be understood as a manifestation of a particular post-Enlightenment form of conduct, namely cynicism. It is this mindset, that of the cynic, which ought to be at the centre of current analyses of the causal relationship between digitally mediated consumption forms and the carious fragmentation of formerly stable democratic institutions. The commentary concludes by outlining the contours of a research programme on consumer cynicism.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2026.2630779

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{stefan2026,
  title        = {{First as tragedy, then as tease: marketable cynicism and the return of fascism}},
  author       = {Stefan Schwarzkopf},
  journal      = {Consumption, Markets and Culture},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2026.2630779},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

First as tragedy, then as tease: marketable cynicism and the return of fascism

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.