Navigating Constraint and Agency: Turkish Irregular Migration and Return Through the Lens of Structuration Theory

Erdem AYÇİÇEK

International Migration2026https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70133article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article examines the migration trajectories and return experiences of Turkish nationals who sought entry to Europe via regular and irregular channels but ultimately returned to Türkiye. Employing a mixed‐methods approach, the study analyses how migrants' actions are shaped by the recursive interplay between structural forces—legal regimes, socio‐economic inequalities and border governance—and individual agency. Grounded in Giddens' Structuration Theory, the analysis conceptualises migration and return as socially embedded practices mediated by institutional constraints and transnational imaginaries. Aspirational narratives of Europe, informed by digital media and social networks, initially guided mobility decisions but often collided with restrictive legal frameworks and socio‐economic exclusion, prompting return as a reflexive recalibration. Rather than a linear or emotive process, return is framed as a negotiated response to structurally embedded conditions. The article advances debates on irregular migration and reintegration by calling for policy approaches that account for both structural determinants and the adaptive agency of returnees.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70133

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{erdem2026,
  title        = {{Navigating Constraint and Agency: Turkish Irregular Migration and Return Through the Lens of Structuration Theory}},
  author       = {Erdem AYÇİÇEK},
  journal      = {International Migration},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70133},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Navigating Constraint and Agency: Turkish Irregular Migration and Return Through the Lens of Structuration Theory

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.