Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Strict Product Liability in the UK: Time for Reform

George Leloudas & Furkan Bulut

Air and Space Law2026https://doi.org/10.54648/aila2026010article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Digitalisation and advanced communication technologies are poised to enable the deployment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in non-segregated airspace through Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS), including those that are autonomous. This transition shifts the primary source of accident risk from human error to product defect. As such, it is critical to assess the adequacy of the relevant compensation mechanisms. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 (CPA 1987) is the primary tool that imposes strict liability on producers for defective products in the UK; however, it was drafted before the widespread deployment of interconnected cyber-physical systems and self-learning algorithms. This article evaluates the application of the CPA 1987 to UAS, arguing it is unable to cater for digital technologies, including (but not limited) to defining the ‘product’, establishing post-supply liability, and addressing the burden of proof for AI applications. Furthermore, it argues that reliance on the operatorfocused section 76 (2)–(4) of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 (CAA 1982) transfers the burden of product defects onto UAS operators. Building upon the new EU Product Liability Directive (PLD), this article concludes that the existing product liability framework of the UK is inadequate and requires reform.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54648/aila2026010

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{george2026,
  title        = {{Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Strict Product Liability in the UK: Time for Reform}},
  author       = {George Leloudas & Furkan Bulut},
  journal      = {Air and Space Law},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54648/aila2026010},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Strict Product Liability in the UK: Time for Reform

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.