arbiter
JournalsAccount

Marketing's Moral Myopia: A Normative Critique of Harmful Product Marketing through the Lens of the AMA Definition

Leah Watkins & R. John Aitken

Journal of Macromarketing2026https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467261422142article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the ethical tension between the American Marketing Association's normative definition of marketing, which emphasises creating value for customers and society, and the marketing of harmful products like tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed foods. These products contribute significantly to global public health crises, including non-communicable diseases and addiction. Using normative marketing theory, stakeholder theory, and ethics theory, the paper argues that promoting such products fundamentally conflicts with the AMA's definition of providing value for society. This contradiction reflects a systemic problem in aligning marketing systems and practice with the AMA's stated definition of social value. Accordingly, the paper challenges the moral legitimacy of market systems that commodify harm while claiming to deliver social value and calls for a reconsideration of marketing's purpose and boundaries in relation to harmful industries. The paper concludes with practical recommendations to realign marketing practice, policy, and education with the discipline's commitment to social value.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467261422142

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{leah2026,
  title        = {{Marketing's Moral Myopia: A Normative Critique of Harmful Product Marketing through the Lens of the AMA Definition}},
  author       = {Leah Watkins & R. John Aitken},
  journal      = {Journal of Macromarketing},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467261422142},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Marketing's Moral Myopia: A Normative Critique of Harmful Product Marketing through the Lens of the AMA Definition

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.