Market differentiation: practices and socio-technical agencing in the craft beer market

Guilherme Almeida Machado et al.

International Journal of Wine Business Research2026https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwbr-08-2024-0048article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to characterize the socio-technical agencing in the craft beer market based on its practices that construct market differentiation. Design/methodology/approach This is a multiple-case study involving nine craft breweries; the data were collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed using content analysis techniques and nonparticipant observation. Findings Four guiding classes of craft beer practices were identified: i) inputs and quality (high value and cost); ii) marketing channels (points of sale and website); iii) types of events and public that frequents them; iv) harmonization and representation of beer with food (sensory issues). These classes group 19 craft practices, and the results demonstrate the heterogeneity of their diffusion among market actors; however, a direct intention of the actors is perceived in agencing practices that construct differentiation of the craft beer market in relation to the mass-produced market. Originality/value This study is valuable in describing the multiplicity in the agencing of craft and the socio-technical nonhomogeneity in the craft beer market. In addition, the study is original in identifying craft practices and their roles in the socio-technical agencing of the craft beer market.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwbr-08-2024-0048

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{guilherme2026,
  title        = {{Market differentiation: practices and socio-technical agencing in the craft beer market}},
  author       = {Guilherme Almeida Machado et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Wine Business Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwbr-08-2024-0048},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Market differentiation: practices and socio-technical agencing in the craft beer market

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.