Unlearning for Democratic Organizing

Owen Powell & Koen P.R. Bartels

Organization Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406261432839article
FT50AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This article advances empirical and conceptual understanding of how unlearning can help to sustain democratic organizing. While learning to confront persistent tensions is widely recognised as a central element of democratic organizing, there is surprisingly little research on its practice. In exploring this gap, unlearning emerged as a distinct yet integral aspect of individual and collective learning in democratic organizing – and to sustaining democratic organizing across time and scale. Our abductive analysis of qualitative research across four established (>20 years) and scaled (>50 members) UK-based worker cooperatives uncovered the centrality of relational processes of unlearning habitual beliefs, values, and patterns of behaviour in interaction with others, the organization, and the environment. Empirically, we discern three relational dynamics that create a need for unlearning and three relational practices for engaging in unlearning. We offer conceptual depth by formulating three analytical propositions for future research and practice.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406261432839

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{owen2026,
  title        = {{Unlearning for Democratic Organizing}},
  author       = {Owen Powell & Koen P.R. Bartels},
  journal      = {Organization Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406261432839},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Unlearning for Democratic Organizing

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.