arbiter
JournalsAccount

The Consequences of Dividing Responsibility for an Audit Engagement

Bethany A. Courson et al.

Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory2025https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2023-017article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

SUMMARY We investigate whether dividing responsibility for an audit engagement results in consequences to the principal auditor or audited company. We find that principal auditors are less likely to be named as defendants in restatement-related class action litigation and shareholders are less likely to initiate restatement-related litigation against the company when the principal auditor divides responsibility. We also find that principal auditors who divide responsibility are more likely to be replaced with a new auditor. Our findings should be informative to the PCAOB who recently decided to retain the principal auditor’s option to divide responsibility, help explain why principal auditors infrequently divide responsibility, and support stakeholder concerns that adding division of responsibility to the audit report could reduce auditor accountability for low-quality auditing. Data Availability: Data are available from the sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: M41; M42; M48.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2023-017

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{bethany2025,
  title        = {{The Consequences of Dividing Responsibility for an Audit Engagement}},
  author       = {Bethany A. Courson et al.},
  journal      = {Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2023-017},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Consequences of Dividing Responsibility for an Audit Engagement

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.