A Short Case for Teaching Why and How to Define Problems First

Jason R. Pierce & Staci Bullard

Management Teaching Review2025https://doi.org/10.1177/23792981251340311article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Problem-solving skills are critically important for managing organizations effectively. Authors of many management texts, therefore, encourage following some version of the age-old problem-solving process, always emphasizing the same staring point: First, define the problem. Despite this consistent emphasis, these texts never seem to include exercises explicitly teaching students why and how to define managerial problems first. We address calls for such instructional material by introducing a one-page-case exercise which shows students why and how they should thoroughly define problems first before attempting to solve them. Our exercise provides a strong context for this purpose as more than 98% of participants propose suboptimal solutions due to insufficiently defining the problem. The debrief then guides students through critical-thinking questions managers must ask to define and ultimately solve problems effectively. This exercise is suitable for students of all levels, including undergraduate, MBA, and executive, in any course in which problem-solving is relevant.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23792981251340311

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jason2025,
  title        = {{A Short Case for Teaching Why and How to Define Problems First}},
  author       = {Jason R. Pierce & Staci Bullard},
  journal      = {Management Teaching Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23792981251340311},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Short Case for Teaching Why and How to Define Problems First

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.