Politicizing Inequality in Times of Sociocultural Conflict: How New Left and Far Right Voters Think About Inequality

Silja Häusermann et al.

Politics and Society2025https://doi.org/10.1177/00323292251353374article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

The antagonism between far right and new left parties has transformed West European politics through increasing sociocultural conflict. We ask what this new cleavage implies for the politicization of inequalities. We contrast two diverging theoretical expectations. The first expects a tradeoff between sociocultural and socioeconomic inequalities, with new left voters emphasizing the former over the latter, and vice versa for far right voters. The second predicts a single dimension of inequality attitudes, from new left “universalists” being inequality averse to far right “particularists” being more inequality tolerant. Evidence based on survey data from Germany supports the second perspective. Even new left voters in the educated middle classes are more averse to all dimensions of inequality than (far) right voters. This implies that a successful new left agenda can simultaneously target various inequalities. However, in contexts of polarized party competition, divisive sociocultural conflicts may crowd out attention to traditional, less divisive socioeconomic inequalities.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00323292251353374

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{silja2025,
  title        = {{Politicizing Inequality in Times of Sociocultural Conflict: How New Left and Far Right Voters Think About Inequality}},
  author       = {Silja Häusermann et al.},
  journal      = {Politics and Society},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00323292251353374},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Politicizing Inequality in Times of Sociocultural Conflict: How New Left and Far Right Voters Think About Inequality

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.