Integrating Industry 4.0 and circular economy principles in emergency third-party logistics service provider selection: a new multi-criteria decision-making approach
Hassan Mina et al.
What the paper says
Purpose The purpose of this study is to integrate Industry 4.0 technologies, circular economy principles and sustainability practices to evaluate emergency third-party logistics service providers (E3PLSPs) using an approach based on multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. Design/methodology/approach This paper develops a two-stage hybrid approach based on MCDM methods. In the first stage, evaluation criteria and sub-criteria are identified, and their independent weights are calculated using the fuzzy stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method. In the second stage, the weighted influence non-linear gauge system (WINGS) technique is used to rank E3PLSPs by considering the interdependencies among the criteria. Findings The proposed approach is validated through its implementation in a disaster management organization in Iran using the knowledge of five experts of this organization. For this purpose, the performance of five E3PLSPs is evaluated using 27 sub-criteria. The results denote that “delivery/service performance,” “cost,” “safe and healthy work environment,” “policies related to human resources,” “technological capabilities” and “financial capability” are six important sub-criteria in the problem under study. The findings of the comparative analysis confirm that considering the dependency among criteria has a significant effect on the final weights of criteria and sub-criteria, and it affects the ranking of E3PLSPs. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper, for the first time, applies economic, social, Industry 4.0 and circular criteria to evaluate E3PLSPs. In addition, a novel MCDM approach consisting of fuzzy SWARA and WINGS methods is used for this purpose.
1 citation
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06 |
| M · momentum | 0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.