Integrating Industry 4.0 and circular economy principles in emergency third-party logistics service provider selection: a new multi-criteria decision-making approach

Hassan Mina et al.

Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management2026https://doi.org/10.1108/jhlscm-05-2025-0076article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to integrate Industry 4.0 technologies, circular economy principles and sustainability practices to evaluate emergency third-party logistics service providers (E3PLSPs) using an approach based on multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. Design/methodology/approach This paper develops a two-stage hybrid approach based on MCDM methods. In the first stage, evaluation criteria and sub-criteria are identified, and their independent weights are calculated using the fuzzy stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method. In the second stage, the weighted influence non-linear gauge system (WINGS) technique is used to rank E3PLSPs by considering the interdependencies among the criteria. Findings The proposed approach is validated through its implementation in a disaster management organization in Iran using the knowledge of five experts of this organization. For this purpose, the performance of five E3PLSPs is evaluated using 27 sub-criteria. The results denote that “delivery/service performance,” “cost,” “safe and healthy work environment,” “policies related to human resources,” “technological capabilities” and “financial capability” are six important sub-criteria in the problem under study. The findings of the comparative analysis confirm that considering the dependency among criteria has a significant effect on the final weights of criteria and sub-criteria, and it affects the ranking of E3PLSPs. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper, for the first time, applies economic, social, Industry 4.0 and circular criteria to evaluate E3PLSPs. In addition, a novel MCDM approach consisting of fuzzy SWARA and WINGS methods is used for this purpose.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jhlscm-05-2025-0076

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hassan2026,
  title        = {{Integrating Industry 4.0 and circular economy principles in emergency third-party logistics service provider selection: a new multi-criteria decision-making approach}},
  author       = {Hassan Mina et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jhlscm-05-2025-0076},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Integrating Industry 4.0 and circular economy principles in emergency third-party logistics service provider selection: a new multi-criteria decision-making approach

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.