Adaptive Sampled Walk: A Simple and Efficient Autonomous Local Search

Matthieu Basseur et al.

Evolutionary Computation2026https://doi.org/10.1162/evco.a.382article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We introduce and explore the automation and adaptation of partial neighborhood local search. Unlike traditional approaches requiring extensive parameter tuning, we design our approach to operate with minimal prerequisites. Specifically, we extend the sampled walk and ID walk algorithms by using distance-based calculations over a sliding window to determine the number of neighbors to evaluate at each step. To validate their performance, we empirically evaluate these parameter-free methods on four challenging combinatorial optimization benchmark problem classes from the literature, comparing them against fixed-parameter versions across multiple values. Our experiments show that, despite their simplicity, generic nature, and absence of parameters, these approaches achieve robust and competitive results across diverse problems-including different solution representations, neighborhood structures, and fitness landscape characteristics-thus validating the viability of generic autonomous local search methods.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/evco.a.382

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{matthieu2026,
  title        = {{Adaptive Sampled Walk: A Simple and Efficient Autonomous Local Search}},
  author       = {Matthieu Basseur et al.},
  journal      = {Evolutionary Computation},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/evco.a.382},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Adaptive Sampled Walk: A Simple and Efficient Autonomous Local Search

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.