The Effect of Career Adaptability and Work Volition on Future Decent Work: An Experimental Study

Yılmaz Hasret & Asım Çivitçi

Career Development Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.70014article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Psychology of working theory (PWT) highlights key psychological resources such as career adaptability and work volition in facilitating access to decent work, particularly for economically disadvantaged individuals who face systemic barriers. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an eight‐session, PWT‐grounded group psychoeducation program on career adaptability, work volition, and future decent work perceptions among economically disadvantaged Turkish undergraduates ( N = 81). A quasi‐experimental 3 (group: intervention, comparison, control) × 4 (time) mixed design was used. Repeated measures MANOVA revealed significant Time × Group interactions. The intervention group achieved significant and sustained improvements across all outcomes, compared to minimal or transient gains in the comparison and control groups. These findings provide novel empirical support for PWT‐based interventions. By fostering key psychological resources, the program appeared to help students navigate contextual barriers and envision more positive work futures. Results highlight group psychoeducation's potential for enhancing career equity and advancing social justice in career outcomes.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.70014

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yılmaz2026,
  title        = {{The Effect of Career Adaptability and Work Volition on Future Decent Work: An Experimental Study}},
  author       = {Yılmaz Hasret & Asım Çivitçi},
  journal      = {Career Development Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.70014},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Effect of Career Adaptability and Work Volition on Future Decent Work: An Experimental Study

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.