arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Inpatient or Outpatient Occupational Rehabilitation – What Works Best for Whom? A Non-randomized Clinical Trial

Monica Eftedal & Chris Jensen

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-026-10363-1article
AJG 2
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Current controlled trials https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12033424 , 15.10.2014, retrospectively registered.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-026-10363-1

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{monica2026,
  title        = {{Inpatient or Outpatient Occupational Rehabilitation – What Works Best for Whom? A Non-randomized Clinical Trial}},
  author       = {Monica Eftedal & Chris Jensen},
  journal      = {Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-026-10363-1},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Inpatient or Outpatient Occupational Rehabilitation – What Works Best for Whom? A Non-randomized Clinical Trial

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.