Labor market responses to energy price volatility in Sub-Saharan Africa: The policy goal is stability by decoupling

Okali Augustin & Guivis Zeufack Nkemgha

Journal of Policy Modeling2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2026.02.008article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Global economic integration increases the vulnerability of Sub-Saharan African nations to external price disturbances. This study examines the effects of energy shocks on labor markets across 31 countries from 2000 to 2022. We use the Augmented Mean Group estimator to address cross-sectional dependence within the panel data. Additionally, a Panel Vector Autoregression model captures the dynamic transmission of these shocks over time. The results reveal that energy price shocks significantly reduce aggregate employment levels. Furthermore, sectoral analysis shows that industrial and agricultural employment contract following energy price hikes.These sectors likely suffer from high energy intensity and limited technical substitution flexibility. Conversely, the service sector shows a positive response, potentially acting as a labor sink. Energy volatility remains a primary driver of structural labor market fluctuations in the region. Therefore, policy interventions must aim to decouple labor market stability from volatile energy price movements.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2026.02.008

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{okali2026,
  title        = {{Labor market responses to energy price volatility in Sub-Saharan Africa: The policy goal is stability by decoupling}},
  author       = {Okali Augustin & Guivis Zeufack Nkemgha},
  journal      = {Journal of Policy Modeling},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2026.02.008},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Labor market responses to energy price volatility in Sub-Saharan Africa: The policy goal is stability by decoupling

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.