Critical reflections on designing an online survey in a decolonial research project

Boitumelo Matlala & Carin Runciman

International Journal of Social Research Methodology2026https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2025.2608154article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Discussions of the decolonisation of quantitative methods have often been overlooked in recent debates. Using Chilisa’s integrative and adaptive methodological framework, we provide a critically reflexive account of the design process of an online multi-lingual survey that sought to unpack pluriversal understandings of democracy in South Africa. The article describes the process we developed to surface the latent assumptions of mainstream survey instruments measuring the understanding of democracy across Africa, and how we used this to inform the development of our own survey instrument. Reflecting on the relative strengths and weaknesses of this approach, we also consider the role of translation as an epistemic exercise. In turn, this leads us to question the epistemic and cultural assumptions that are embedded in the Likert scale and how uncritical adaptation may undermine decolonial intentions. By sharing these insights, we hope to expand the discussion of the decolonisation of quantitative methods.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2025.2608154

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{boitumelo2026,
  title        = {{Critical reflections on designing an online survey in a decolonial research project}},
  author       = {Boitumelo Matlala & Carin Runciman},
  journal      = {International Journal of Social Research Methodology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2025.2608154},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Critical reflections on designing an online survey in a decolonial research project

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.