Job Demand or Resource?

Franziska Schrade et al.

Zeitschrift fur Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie2025https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000456article
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Artificial intelligence (AI) can function both as a job demand and as a job resource, with crucial implications for employees’ well-being and motivation. However, research has not yet investigated how employees appraise AI in these terms and whether their appraisals are malleable. To fill this gap, we conducted an online experiment with 203 German white-collar workers. We randomly assigned the participants to a demand, resource, or control condition. The manipulation consisted of a focused reflection on AI either as a demand or a resource for the participant’s current job. Results indicated that our induced focus did not significantly influence the participants’ AI appraisal. Across experimental conditions, the participants appraised AI more as a resource than a demand ( d = 1.05). These findings allow new insights into the appraisal of AI at work by distinguishing demand and resource appraisals, highlighting the robustness of AI appraisals, and suggesting that employees currently view AI primarily as supportive.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000456

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{franziska2025,
  title        = {{Job Demand or Resource?}},
  author       = {Franziska Schrade et al.},
  journal      = {Zeitschrift fur Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000456},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Job Demand or Resource?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.