arbiter
JournalsAccount

Protecting People or Promoting Ideologies? Insights From the Constitutional Asylum Dataset

Frowin Rausis & Marco Di Giuseppe

International Migration Review2026https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183251409789article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Asylum is widely associated with humanitarian norms and domestic laws in liberal democracies. Reflecting this assumption, systematic information on the evolution of asylum provisions in national constitutions remains limited, and comparative analyses of the motives behind the legal codification of refugee protection in autocracies are even scarcer. This research note addresses these gaps by introducing the Constitutional Asylum (COAS) dataset, which captures asylum provisions in the constitutions of all 193 UN member states from 1789 to 2023. The findings challenge conventional wisdom, revealing that autocracies, not democracies, have been the main adopters of constitutional asylum. While both regime types have used constitutional asylum to spread ideologies abroad, autocracies have done so more extensively and additionally leveraged it to strengthen presidential power. These results show that asylum is not merely a humanitarian norm but also a strategic instrument of statecraft, used to consolidate power within states and advance geopolitical agendas abroad.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183251409789

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{frowin2026,
  title        = {{Protecting People or Promoting Ideologies? Insights From the Constitutional Asylum Dataset}},
  author       = {Frowin Rausis & Marco Di Giuseppe},
  journal      = {International Migration Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183251409789},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Protecting People or Promoting Ideologies? Insights From the Constitutional Asylum Dataset

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.