Testing Mean Stability of Heteroskedastic Time Series

Violetta Dalla et al.

Journal of Time Series Analysis2025https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12840article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.47

Abstract

Time series models are often fitted to the data without preliminary checks for stability of the mean and variance, conditions that may not hold in much economic and financial data, particularly over long periods. Ignoring such shifts may result in fitting models with spurious dynamics that lead to unsupported and controversial conclusions about time dependence, causality, and the effects of unanticipated shocks. In spite of what may seem as obvious differences between a time series of independent variates with changing variance and a stationary conditionally heteroskedastic (GARCH) process, such processes may be hard to distinguish in applied work using basic time series diagnostic tools. We develop and study some practical and easily implemented statistical procedures to test the mean and variance stability of uncorrelated and serially dependent time series. Application of the new methods to analyze the volatility properties of stock market returns leads to some unexpectedly surprising findings concerning the advantages of modeling time‐varying changes in unconditional variance.

5 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12840

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{violetta2025,
  title        = {{Testing Mean Stability of Heteroskedastic Time Series}},
  author       = {Violetta Dalla et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Time Series Analysis},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12840},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Testing Mean Stability of Heteroskedastic Time Series

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.47

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.41 × 0.4 = 0.16
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.