Rethinking Responsibility in the Digital Age: A Narrative Approach

François‐Xavier de Vaujany et al.

MIS Quarterly2025https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2025/17970article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.44

Abstract

Researchers, policymakers, and industry are increasingly aware of the urgent risks and threats arising in the digital age. Their awareness of this urgency has led to a rise of interest in responsibility. While this ‘turn to responsibility’ has been well-intentioned, an underappreciated problem is that the dominant, centuries-old view of responsibility is not up to this task – it is unable to make sense of the increasingly extended scope of responsibility in the digital age because it is mired in outdated assumptions about causality, agency, and human action. Inspired by Paul Ricoeur’s philosophy, we show the benefits of rethinking responsibility as an ongoing process of becoming responsible—that is, becoming responsible by being imputed through the narrative emplotment of extended sociomaterial events. We illustrate the benefits of this conception for the digital age using vignettes from plagiarism detection, social media, and AI. The paper concludes by proposing a Ricoeur-inspired narrative topology of the multidimensional time-space of responsibility emplotment. The paper calls on the MIS community and society more broadly to draw on this topology to reflect on their imputations and take up responsibility, individually and collectively.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2025/17970

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{françois‐xavier2025,
  title        = {{Rethinking Responsibility in the Digital Age: A Narrative Approach}},
  author       = {François‐Xavier de Vaujany et al.},
  journal      = {MIS Quarterly},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2025/17970},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Rethinking Responsibility in the Digital Age: A Narrative Approach

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.