Online Demand Fulfillment Problem with Initial Inventory Placement: A Regret Analysis

Alessandro Arlotto et al.

Operations Research2026https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2024.0983article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Studying How Inventory Placement Shapes Online Fulfillment Performance A growing share of e-commerce operations involves deciding not only how to fulfill incoming orders, but also where to position inventory beforehand. In “Online Demand Fulfillment Problem with Initial Inventory Placement: A Regret Analysis,” Arlotto, Keskin, and Wei examine how these two decisions interact. The authors introduce a joint regret framework that evaluates the performance of a fulfillment policy together with the initial allocation of inventory across warehouses. Their analysis shows that probabilistic fulfillment inevitably accumulates regret that grows with the length of the planning horizon, regardless of how inventory is initially placed. By contrast, when combined with an appropriate offline inventory placement, the score-based approach achieves a regret bound that remains stable over time and scales only with the size of the system. The study offers insight into the role of initial placement in shaping fulfillment policy performance.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2024.0983

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alessandro2026,
  title        = {{Online Demand Fulfillment Problem with Initial Inventory Placement: A Regret Analysis}},
  author       = {Alessandro Arlotto et al.},
  journal      = {Operations Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2024.0983},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Online Demand Fulfillment Problem with Initial Inventory Placement: A Regret Analysis

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.