arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Selective development goals: examining Japan’s SDG implementation gaps

Paul Christensen et al.

Social Science Japan Journal2025https://doi.org/10.1093/ssjj/jyaf021article
ABDC C
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

Abstract In this article, we consider how efforts by the Japanese government and private sector to make the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) prominent and pervasive reveal obfuscation around issues and concerns purportedly being addressed. We examine three specific components of the SDGs: no poverty, zero hunger, and gender equality. In doing so, we demonstrate a disjuncture between official proclamations endorsing an SDG agenda and ethnographic observations that illustrate the hollowness of these efforts. We argue that the SDGs, a repository of lofty and aspirational goals, many of which are arguably necessary for planetary health and collective well-being, are used by the Japanese government as an instrument of techno-political effect to obscure root causes of persistent societal issues. The result of which nurtures and perhaps sustains insufficient social, political, and structural changes throughout Japan.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ssjj/jyaf021

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{paul2025,
  title        = {{Selective development goals: examining Japan’s SDG implementation gaps}},
  author       = {Paul Christensen et al.},
  journal      = {Social Science Japan Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ssjj/jyaf021},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Selective development goals: examining Japan’s SDG implementation gaps

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.