The rise of learning and development – forty years of change
Ian Cunningham
What the paper says
Purpose The aim is to trace important aspects of the changes in organizational learning and development over the 40-year history of this journal. Design/methodology/approach The paper is a Viewpoint. Findings Changes from the use of “training” to more of a focus on “learning and development” are evident. However, some of this appears to be re-badging and not necessarily changing the focus of the work. Research limitations/implications The impact of AI needs significant investment in new research. Practical implications A real focus on learning is important in helping organizations change for the better. Originality/value The historical examples point to the value of this journal in being at the forefront of change in the fields of L&D, organizational development and leadership development.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.