arbiter
JournalsAccount

Parental Partiality in Unjust Circumstances: Inheritance as Insurance

Anca Gheaus

Ethics: an international journal of social, political, and legal philosophy2026https://doi.org/10.1086/739645article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

There is broad egalitarian agreement that inheritance results in distributive injustice and indirectly delegitimizes the political process; we should abolish it. But until we do this and put in place public safety nets, parents do no wrong in insuring their children against destitution. Both procreative liability and parental love generate duties that justify some bequests, limited in size and form. In the aggregate, however, the bequests are likely to be substantial, impeding egalitarian reforms. The stringency and demandingness of procreative and parental duties provide (would-be) parents with special and powerful reason to support justice and, in particular, public safety nets.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/739645

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{anca2026,
  title        = {{Parental Partiality in Unjust Circumstances: Inheritance as Insurance}},
  author       = {Anca Gheaus},
  journal      = {Ethics: an international journal of social, political, and legal philosophy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/739645},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Parental Partiality in Unjust Circumstances: Inheritance as Insurance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.