arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Multimodal Fusion-Based Explainable Model for Capital Market Intelligent Audit Risk Assessment

Hao Cheng & Kang Zhang

Information Resources Management Journal2026https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.404004article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Amid global digital transformation and heterogeneous financial data explosion, traditional audits fail to effectively utilize unstructured information and identify dynamic fraud. This study proposed an intelligent audit risk assessment model integrating multimodal data fusion and explainable stacking ensemble learning. Using China Securities Index 300 companies' data (2018–2022), the study constructed dynamic financial indicators and text features and adopted random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, bidirectional long short-term memory with SHapley Additive exPlanations for interpretability. Experimental results showed the model's accuracy reached 95.3%, outperforming eXtreme Gradient Boosting (92.1%) and logistic regression (88.4%). It effectively detected hidden financial fraud, providing technical support for capital market supervision.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.404004

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hao2026,
  title        = {{Multimodal Fusion-Based Explainable Model for Capital Market Intelligent Audit Risk Assessment}},
  author       = {Hao Cheng & Kang Zhang},
  journal      = {Information Resources Management Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.404004},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Multimodal Fusion-Based Explainable Model for Capital Market Intelligent Audit Risk Assessment

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.