arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

The absorption vs. direct costing debate: a compromise solution

Parvez R. Sopariwala

Cost Management2009article
ABDC C
Weight
0.31

What the paper says

No abstract available.

3 citations

Cite this paper

@article{parvez2009,
  title        = {{The absorption vs. direct costing debate: a compromise solution}},
  author       = {Parvez R. Sopariwala},
  journal      = {Cost Management},
  year         = {2009},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The absorption vs. direct costing debate: a compromise solution

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.31

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.14 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.