Electoral Cycles in Fiscal Rules: International Empirical Evidence

Hoyong Jung & Bong Hwan Kim

CESifo Economic Studies2024https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifae019article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.49

What the paper says

Abstract Using panel data from 99 countries over the period of 1985–2020, this study aims to uncover that fiscal rules work in electoral cycles. The results show that fiscal rules are less likely to be implemented in the pre-election year. We also find that this loosening in fiscal rules is especially prominent in cases when the incumbent political party can wield significant political power, where countries are less developed economically and politically, and where the management of fiscal rules is more likely to be exposed to discretionary interventions. Our findings are aligned with the opportunistic political budget cycles, in which politicians exploit fiscal policies and systems to serve their own political incentives. These results suggest that even fiscal rules, which are designed to prevent political pressure, are also subject to political process. (JEL codes: D72, D78, E32, E62, H11, and H60).

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifae019

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hoyong2024,
  title        = {{Electoral Cycles in Fiscal Rules: International Empirical Evidence}},
  author       = {Hoyong Jung & Bong Hwan Kim},
  journal      = {CESifo Economic Studies},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifae019},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Electoral Cycles in Fiscal Rules: International Empirical Evidence

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.49

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.47 × 0.4 = 0.19
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.