Financial Market Globalization, Growth, and Inequality of Nations: A Multicountry Case

Wai‐Hong Ho & Cheng Zheng

Journal of Public Economic Theory2026https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70104article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper proposes a world economy growth model where countries are plagued with domestic credit market imperfections, and there are knowledge spillovers diffusing from technologically advanced countries to backward ones. Under some conditions, globalizing financial markets beget uphill international credit flows which amplify all countries' initial income gaps, giving rise to a ranking of countries in terms of their living standards. The analysis shows that, while disconnecting from the world financial market helps a country to raise its income level, it impedes growth. A redistribution of total wage income from the highest‐income to the lowest‐income country narrows the income distances between countries, and it may speed up growth. The world economic growth rate increases with the number of countries participating in the international financial market.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70104

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{wai‐hong2026,
  title        = {{Financial Market Globalization, Growth, and Inequality of Nations: A Multicountry Case}},
  author       = {Wai‐Hong Ho & Cheng Zheng},
  journal      = {Journal of Public Economic Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70104},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Financial Market Globalization, Growth, and Inequality of Nations: A Multicountry Case

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.