Caste and Credit: Discrimination in India’s Credit Sector

Navjot Sangwan & Bibhas Saha

Progress in Development Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934251411694article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This article examines how caste shapes access to credit in India’s formal and informal lending markets. Using nationally representative data from the India Human Development Survey (2011–2012), we analyse loan application rates and loan amounts and compare outcomes between General Castes (GC) and three lower-caste groups: Other Backward Castes (OBC), Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST). We find that GC households are more likely to apply for and receive larger loans from formal banks, while lower-caste households rely more heavily on informal moneylenders. A substantial share of these credit gaps—particularly in bank lending—remains unexplained by observable characteristics, pointing to potential caste-based discrimination. In contrast, moneylenders do not appear to penalize lower-caste borrowers to the same extent and, in some cases, lend more than expected to OBC households. These findings suggest that entrenched caste hierarchies continue to influence credit access in India, with formal institutions reinforcing rather than correcting social inequalities.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934251411694

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{navjot2026,
  title        = {{Caste and Credit: Discrimination in India’s Credit Sector}},
  author       = {Navjot Sangwan & Bibhas Saha},
  journal      = {Progress in Development Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934251411694},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Caste and Credit: Discrimination in India’s Credit Sector

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.