arbiter
JournalsAccount

FUNDING AND OVERFUNDING PHENOMENA IN CROWDFUNDING: RELEVANCE OF PLATFORM CHOICE AND VARYING INDUSTRY DYNAMICS

Dominika P. Gałkiewicz & Michal Galkiewicz

Applied Finance Letters2024https://doi.org/10.24135/afl.v13i.663article
ABDC B
Weight
0.43

Abstract

This study provides new evidence on factors relevant for the success of crowdfunding campaigns run in Europe between 2015 and 2017 on the most popular crowdfunding platforms in Germany/Austria – Kickstarter.com and Startnext.com. In particular, for this study, a sample of 10,514 campaigns from Germany and Austria for the first time serves as a basis for identifying the determinants of the level of projects’ (over-)funding. For crowdfunding projects, an increase in a project’s funding goal results in higher funding on both platforms, but this does not guarantee success, i.e. reaching the relevant funding goal. Projects with a higher success probability show lower funding goals, especially if launched on Startnext.com. In contrast, a longer duration negligibly increases the amount raised on Startnext and slightly decreases on Kickstarter. On Startnext, projects from the Art cluster have a higher chance to succeed, while these from the Technology cluster show smaller success probabilities as they regularly get less funding. On Kickstarter, projects from the Art, Technology, or Lifestyle field reach higher financing as compared to the Sustainability area. We show that the uncertainty about market size and project/founder quality leads to diverging over- and underfunding levels across platforms and industry clusters, which is of core importance to interested stakeholder groups.
 Key words: crowdfunding, crowd, reward, Kickstarter, Startnext

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24135/afl.v13i.663

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{dominika2024,
  title        = {{FUNDING AND OVERFUNDING PHENOMENA IN CROWDFUNDING: RELEVANCE OF PLATFORM CHOICE AND VARYING INDUSTRY DYNAMICS}},
  author       = {Dominika P. Gałkiewicz & Michal Galkiewicz},
  journal      = {Applied Finance Letters},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24135/afl.v13i.663},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

FUNDING AND OVERFUNDING PHENOMENA IN CROWDFUNDING: RELEVANCE OF PLATFORM CHOICE AND VARYING INDUSTRY DYNAMICS

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.43

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.31 × 0.4 = 0.12
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.