‘The new European sectoral social dialogue for social services: The “bite” challenge, the coordination potential and the future of care’

Manuela Galetto & Stefano Neri

European Journal of Industrial Relations2026https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801261423744article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article examines the establishment of the European Sectoral Social Dialogue Committee (ESSDC) for Social Services and its potential to address the job quality dimension of Europe’s care trilemma – balancing service coverage, fiscal constraints and working conditions. Drawing on qualitative research, including 133 interviews across 11 countries and document analysis, we explore how this supranational forum can influence national employment practices in a sector marked by varied provision models and weak industrial relations. While ESSDCs have been criticised for limited ‘bite’ in shaping national policies, we argue that their coordination capacity offers meaningful leverage, particularly in countries with underdeveloped social dialogue. Our findings highlight both structural constraints and promising dynamics of knowledge-sharing. We conclude that although binding outcomes remain unlikely, the ESSDC fosters a community of practice that reframes care work as an investment, not a cost, enabling incremental improvements in job quality and professionalisation.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801261423744

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{manuela2026,
  title        = {{‘The new European sectoral social dialogue for social services: The “bite” challenge, the coordination potential and the future of care’}},
  author       = {Manuela Galetto & Stefano Neri},
  journal      = {European Journal of Industrial Relations},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801261423744},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

‘The new European sectoral social dialogue for social services: The “bite” challenge, the coordination potential and the future of care’

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.