A unified Bayesian framework for mortality model selection

Alex Diana et al.

Annals of Actuarial Science2025https://doi.org/10.1017/s1748499525100146article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

In recent years, a wide range of mortality models has been proposed to address the diverse factors influencing mortality rates, which has highlighted the need to perform model selection. Traditional mortality model selection methods, such as AIC and BIC, often require fitting multiple models independently and ranking them based on these criteria. This process can fail to account for uncertainties in model selection, which can lead to overly optimistic prediction intervals, and it disregards the potential insights from combining models. To address these limitations, we propose a novel Bayesian model selection framework that integrates model selection and parameter estimation into the same process. This requires creating a model-building framework that will give rise to different models by choosing different parametric forms for each term. Inference is performed using the reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, which is devised to allow for transition between models of different dimensions, as is the case for the models considered here. We develop modeling frameworks for data stratified by age and period and for data stratified by age, period, and product. Our results are presented in two case studies.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1748499525100146

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alex2025,
  title        = {{A unified Bayesian framework for mortality model selection}},
  author       = {Alex Diana et al.},
  journal      = {Annals of Actuarial Science},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1748499525100146},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A unified Bayesian framework for mortality model selection

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.