Financialised valuation dynamics and power of finance: The 2023 U.S. banking crisis

İsmail Ertürk & Raghu Bansal

Competition and Change2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251413828article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a theoretical framework called ‘financialised valuation dynamics’, situated within debates on the power of finance, drawing on the conceptual and empirical contributions of early financialisation studies on firm competition in stock markets and the conjunctural nature of valuations. We analyse the 2023 U.S. banking crisis using our theoretical framework to demonstrate that the regulators’ ex-post explanation of the crisis as interest rate risk mismanagement and the concentration of uninsured deposits at the three failed banks ignores fundamental sources of financial instability that central banks have contributed to through monetary policy. We argue, through empirical analysis, that financialised valuation dynamics exercise taxonomic power and narrativise the business models of the three failed banks, which had led them to outperform other U.S. banks in stock market valuation before their failure. Financialised valuation dynamics depicted the three failed banks as ‘niche’ banks serving disruptive technology firms, which were conjuncturally regarded as the future growth engines of capitalism following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251413828

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{i̇smail2026,
  title        = {{Financialised valuation dynamics and power of finance: The 2023 U.S. banking crisis}},
  author       = {İsmail Ertürk & Raghu Bansal},
  journal      = {Competition and Change},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251413828},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Financialised valuation dynamics and power of finance: The 2023 U.S. banking crisis

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.