Managing the Dual Business Model Trade-off in Multinational Corporations

Sergei Mozheiko & Kristian J. Sund

Journal of Business Models2024https://doi.org/10.54337/jbm.v12i3.8471article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.51

What the paper says

When a multinational operates different business models in different markets, a trade-off typically exists between local-market adaptations and cross-market economies of scale and scope. How do country managers navigate these trade-offs and the tensions inherent in developing and operating such dual business models? In this short paper we explore how a local subsidiary can innovate its business model in a way that creates alignment with the local market while respecting the larger corporate structure. We study the Chinese subsidiary of Velux, a multinational window manufacturer, that has transformed its business model from simple production to engineering, and further to modular solutions. We show that by respecting both the corporate strategic mission and the corporate culture, in combination with avoiding any direct challenge to the core corporate business model, the subsidiary has bypassed the tensions commonly observed with dual business models.

4 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54337/jbm.v12i3.8471

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sergei2024,
  title        = {{Managing the Dual Business Model Trade-off in Multinational Corporations}},
  author       = {Sergei Mozheiko & Kristian J. Sund},
  journal      = {Journal of Business Models},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54337/jbm.v12i3.8471},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Managing the Dual Business Model Trade-off in Multinational Corporations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.51

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.48 × 0.4 = 0.19
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.