Practice forum on pay disclosure

Christian Grund et al.

German Journal of Human Resource Management2025https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022251315578article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

A pressing question facing many firms today is whether to disclose pay information, what specific details to disclose, and to whom this information should be revealed. Despite the relevance of pay disclosure in practice, the perspectives of practitioners on this topic have received little attention from academics. This article provides a forum in which practitioners share lessons-learned, best practices, and implementation challenges associated with pay disclosure. The forum assembles contributions from compensation specialists, employers and worker representatives from Austria, Germany and Switzerland, and displays the heterogeneity of attitudes toward to pay disclosure. We hypothesize that these differences are closely linked to variations in corporate culture, particularly in relation to the levels of trust and employee empowerment within organizations. The practice forum offers a first step for a dialogue between practitioners and scholars working in the area of pay disclosure.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022251315578

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{christian2025,
  title        = {{Practice forum on pay disclosure}},
  author       = {Christian Grund et al.},
  journal      = {German Journal of Human Resource Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022251315578},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Practice forum on pay disclosure

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.